Give a talk: Difference between revisions

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Jadrian Miles (talk | contribs)
Replacing page with '{{stub}} While this HOWTO is under construction, you might find the SciVis meeting talk rubric useful in guiding your talk-giving t...'
Line 1: Line 1:
<pre>
{{stub}}
Rubric for SciVis Talks
(4 is proficient)


READINESS
While this HOWTO is under construction, you might find the [[SciVis Meetings#Rubric for SciVis Talks|SciVis meeting talk rubric]] useful in guiding your talk-giving technique.
5: polished practice talk with very few minor changes suggested
4: complete talk ready and presented, effective visuals (or placeholders), some organizational issues
3: complete talk ready and presented, significant organizational issues
2: at least 75% of talk ready and presented, significant gaps and organizational issues
1: less than 75% of talk ready


MESSAGE CLARITY:
[[Category:HOWTO]][[Category:Dissemination]]
5: clear and compelling message with an intuitive organizational flow and in-depth explanation.
4: clear message with some organizational issues and sufficient explanation.
3: mostly clear message with significant organizational issues and sufficient explanation.
2: unclear message with serious organizational issues and insufficient explanation
1: unclear message with little attempt at organization or explanation. 
 
VISUALS
5: visuals strongly complement talk content and message and are incorporated smoothly into presentation
4: many visuals complement talk, but some are unclear or not verbally connected to the presentation
3: slides do not detract from presentation, but do not complement it well
2: slides are distracting or confusing in some places
1: slides are consistently distracting or confusing
 
SPEECH
5: verbal explanation relates to and extends the information from the visual slides in a focused and interactive way, does not rely too heavily on reading off the slides.
4: verbal explanation relates to and extends the information from the visual slides in a focused and interactive way, some reading from slides.
3:  reads from slides with some extra explanation.
2: reads all information directly from slides, talk is confusing or unfocused in some places. 
1: reads all information directly from slides, talk is consistently confusing or unfocused.
 
APPEARANCE OF MASTERY
5: delivers the talk in a compelling and focused way, comfortable demeanor, encourages positive interaction with audience.
4: delivers a focused talk with positive audience interaction, comfortable demeanor.
3: delivers a mostly focused talk, interacts occasionally with audience, mostly comfortable demeanor.
2: talk is distracted in some places, interacts sparingly with audience, appears uncomfortable.
1: distracted talk, no audience interaction or rude audience interaction, appears uncomfortable and/or negative.
</pre>

Revision as of 22:52, 10 November 2008

While this HOWTO is under construction, you might find the SciVis meeting talk rubric useful in guiding your talk-giving technique.