CS295J/Class 10

From VrlWiki
Revision as of 18:17, 2 April 2009 by David Laidlaw (talk | contribs) (New page: * intro evals ** metrics *** C: bring cognitive and perceptual modeling to bear in principled way on HCI design *** S: scoped to 5 people over 5 years *** I: high impact *** N: innovation ...)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • intro evals
    • metrics
      • C: bring cognitive and perceptual modeling to bear in principled way on HCI design
      • S: scoped to 5 people over 5 years
      • I: high impact
      • N: innovation
      • A: analytical domain (supports hard thinking)
    • global comments
      • more explicit what/how
      • "We propose" at start and "five years ... $2.5M" by Gideon and Jon excellent -- emulate!
      • terser
      • a concrete thing for the $2.5M would be good; what will they get as opposed to what will we do? a theoretical foundation? better UI's? a system for automatically evaluating UI's? new knowledge about cognition?
      • steven + (adam, trevor, gideon | gideon and jon) would capture everything
    • Meta-work and Task-Interruption Support Interfaces (andrew)
      • (100) C=20, S=20, I=40%, N=20% (too focused on CS domain, scope too small, needs to appear to move outside HCI more, innovation unclear, good balance between rhetoric and specifics)
    • Collaborative 2 (need better title) (adam, trevor, gideon)
      • (220) C=60%, S=40, I=60%, N=60% ("computational models" too vague, good goal for connection to psych, probably need more specifics and tighter language to make them fit, hard to scope)
    • alternative collaborative (still need better title) (adam, trevor, gideon)
      • (270) C=70%, S=60, I=70%, N=70% (nice 1st para, 2nd para a little mushy, 3rd para needs work)
    • A Distributed Cognition Model of Human-Computer Interaction (gideon and jon)
      • (270) C=70%, S=70, I=70%, N=60% (a bit abstract, nice connection between areas, explicit scope good, question strange, focus on distributed cognition intriguing although it may be risky, "gaps" bit sounds too much like fishing)
    • EJ (need a better title) (ej)
      • (200) C=60%, S=40, I=50%, N=50% (too rambling at start: more solution less problem, hidden "we propose", scope hard to eval)
    • A Behavioral/Cognitive Model of Human-Computer Interaction (steven)
      • (190) iC=40%, S=50, I=40%, N=60% (good concrete goals and activities, "doomed to antiquation" great, not enough application)
  • pick out proposal-relevant aspects of new readings
    • finish preliminary results section you have been working on (it will have been 30 hours!)
  • assignment
    • finish preliminary results section you have been working on (it will have been 30 hours!)
    • critical enough?
    • are we getting rid of non-contributions?
    • list of cost/benefits for contributions