CS295J/Week 5.11

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search

tuesday class notes

  • remaining papers from Thursday
    • continue to build on project ideas
    • what are the next steps?
  • draft or storyboard a usage scenario of a brain scientist using "the tool"
  • critique a few revision comments
  • pair up to work on some
  • critique the changes
  • feedback on class
    • superficial paper discussions, going too fast; do some in more depth?
    • maybe too much breadth -- connect back to a theme (or a few?)

thursday class notes

  • Theory: implications for HCI
    • leading Russian psychology approach
    • should HCI progress be as fast as technological progress?
    • “Computer supported cooperative work" (C S C W)
    • this seems like a whole other set of literature
    • object exist, not just as affordances
    • actions, goals, motives -- frustration higher as each is blocked
    • six inter-related principles: mind/environment, objects, hierarchical-, internalization-externalization, mediation, development
    • I like the "other tools than computers" aspect, including social
    • HCI methods (theories?) are "inevitably obsolete soon after they are formulated"
    • I would like more concrete examples
  • Spanning seven orders of magnitude: a challenge for cognitive modeling
    • 2002
    • educational application: applicable to analysis?
    • Biological, Cognitive, Rational, Social: 10ms to 10hrs
    • Theses: Decomposition, Relevance (don't use quantum for bridges), Modeling, unit-task level useful
    • need more work to establish relevance and modeling theses at lower levels (as of 2002)
    • accessible writing
    • observed tendency of humans to break things up into pieces of different sizes. interesting paper from last year talked about a bunching of tasks into units of attention, some number of minutes around 10 -- might have been 7 or 17 or 12?
    • EPIC, SOAR, ACT-R/PM
    • high-density sensing
    • “read the error message”
    • the scary ambiguity of low level action and how it correlates to higher level intent -- BIG RISK -- can we ameliorate/demo? understand better?
  • An Insight-Based Methodology for Evaluating Bioinformatics Visualizations
  • what kind of projects should we do?
    • recording and analysis of Eni using diffusion tract tools
      • others did other similar ethnographic projects
      • other user analyses: e-mail (low level, but decamp&modeling?)
    • longer projects from last class (check on wiki)
  • 50-day Project criteria
    • logical chain connecting it to brain science and connectivity and interaction and cognition
    • scope
    • research contribution AND/OR demonstration of feasibility or risk reduction
  • critique a few revision comments
  • concrete things to do
    • 5-day project -- watch a few people do something potentially analogous
    • draft proposal for a 50-day project
    • yes, we are somewhat clueless, but that is how research is sometimes