Diffusion Processing Pipeline/bugs and feature requests: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* <tt>mrifilt3</tt>, <tt>mricrop</tt>, <tt>mrisubset</tt>, and possibly others mangle the parameters file. In particular, if you operate on a DWI, the output won't have the b matrix recorded. Also the <tt>MRISpaceShift</tt> just gets clobbered to 0 0 0. | * <tt>mrifilt3</tt>, <tt>mricrop</tt>, <tt>mrisubset</tt>, and possibly others mangle the parameters file. In particular, if you operate on a DWI, the output won't have the b matrix recorded. Also the <tt>MRISpaceShift</tt> just gets clobbered to 0 0 0. | ||
** A workaround right now for the b matrix is <pre>grep "^b" $src/parameters >> $dest/parameters</pre> | ** A workaround right now for the b matrix, TR, and TE is <pre>grep "^b\|e0" $src/parameters >> $dest/parameters</pre> | ||
* Streamtube generation gets slower and slower as the program runs. What's going on? Is it running out of memory, reading inefficiently through a big file, doing something probabilistic that gets less likely the more tubes there are? We need a speedup! | * Streamtube generation gets slower and slower as the program runs. What's going on? Is it running out of memory, reading inefficiently through a big file, doing something probabilistic that gets less likely the more tubes there are? We need a speedup! | ||
[[Category:Diffusion MRI]][[Category:Bug Tracking Pages]] | [[Category:Diffusion MRI]][[Category:Bug Tracking Pages]] | ||
Revision as of 17:04, 10 November 2008
- mrifilt3, mricrop, mrisubset, and possibly others mangle the parameters file. In particular, if you operate on a DWI, the output won't have the b matrix recorded. Also the MRISpaceShift just gets clobbered to 0 0 0.
- A workaround right now for the b matrix, TR, and TE is
grep "^b\|e0" $src/parameters >> $dest/parameters
- A workaround right now for the b matrix, TR, and TE is
- Streamtube generation gets slower and slower as the program runs. What's going on? Is it running out of memory, reading inefficiently through a big file, doing something probabilistic that gets less likely the more tubes there are? We need a speedup!