CS295J/Project ideas from week 4: Difference between revisions
< CS295J
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=== brain-science workflows === | |||
* describe and critique a brain-scientist software workflow | |||
** which interactive software? | |||
** workflow (which can include non-software parts, like wet or dry experiments | |||
** how much of their time is spent on this workflow? | |||
** what are positive elements of the workflow? | |||
** what are negative elements? | |||
*** wasted time, lost opportunities, annoyances, etc. -- | |||
*** quantify negatives, if possible | |||
** how could our proposed ideas improve this? | |||
=== (50)-day projects === | === (50)-day projects === | ||
* initial brain scientist agenda | * initial brain scientist agenda | ||
Revision as of 16:37, 6 October 2011
brain-science workflows
- describe and critique a brain-scientist software workflow
- which interactive software?
- workflow (which can include non-software parts, like wet or dry experiments
- how much of their time is spent on this workflow?
- what are positive elements of the workflow?
- what are negative elements?
- wasted time, lost opportunities, annoyances, etc. --
- quantify negatives, if possible
- how could our proposed ideas improve this?
(50)-day projects
- initial brain scientist agenda
- we're pondering how to build analysis-assistiance software
- integrates primary (imaging?) data
- connectivity (cells, cell groups/types, brain regions)
- literature pointers re connections and cell types and brain regions
- what would you want to see in a tool like this?
- what would you use it for and how?
- we're pondering how to build analysis-assistiance software
- Make an agenda of questions for Schnitzer and then have a conf call
- some input on what Mark Schnitzer wants to do
- look at primary microscope data at level of groups of cells
- access literature related to connections that they see (e.g., specific database I can't remember)
- generate hypotheses (about?)
- identify experiments to do
- pose or test models
- some input on what Mark Schnitzer wants to do
- other local brain scientists
- Win Gongvatana/Ron Cohen
- Steve Correia (VA)
- David Badre
- Michael Frank
- Steve Sloman (reasoning, decision making) (mind, not brain)
- Thomas Serre (modeling specific vision-related circuits)
- everyone in CLiPS
- some preliminary demo that goes beyond correlative analysis to a causal system
- this might be a completely different proposal...
- Observe brain scientists analyze with diagrams & summarize
- Paper diagrams,
- Something they actually use
- Commercial (Tableau) or other existing tools
- Postits “interface” (data & analysis results)
- build on Agrawal et al and have students design a system
- then pull out design principles, perhaps cognitively motivated
- use proxy task based on social network analysis that would be student friendly
- automatically detect cognitive load from voice analysis (or galvanic skin response? or facial expression?)
- diagram recommender
- open-source repository
- Caputured video of index card experiments
- library of brain imagery
- Codings of video
- Way for others to contribute codings (incentivized?)
- taxtonomy of tasks (or design space) for #1
- cognitive skills of brain scientists (spatial, visual/textual, WM size, prob solving, ... )