CS295J/Project ideas from week 4: Difference between revisions

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
=== brain-science workflows ===
* describe and critique a brain-scientist software workflow
** which interactive software?
** workflow (which can include non-software parts, like wet or dry experiments
** how much of their time is spent on this workflow?
** what are positive elements of the workflow?
** what are negative elements?
*** wasted time, lost opportunities, annoyances, etc. --
*** quantify negatives, if possible
** how could our proposed ideas improve this?
=== (50)-day projects ===
=== (50)-day projects ===
*      initial brain scientist agenda
*      initial brain scientist agenda

Revision as of 16:37, 6 October 2011

brain-science workflows

  • describe and critique a brain-scientist software workflow
    • which interactive software?
    • workflow (which can include non-software parts, like wet or dry experiments
    • how much of their time is spent on this workflow?
    • what are positive elements of the workflow?
    • what are negative elements?
      • wasted time, lost opportunities, annoyances, etc. --
      • quantify negatives, if possible
    • how could our proposed ideas improve this?

(50)-day projects

  • initial brain scientist agenda
    • we're pondering how to build analysis-assistiance software
      • integrates primary (imaging?) data
      • connectivity (cells, cell groups/types, brain regions)
      • literature pointers re connections and cell types and brain regions
    • what would you want to see in a tool like this?
    • what would you use it for and how?
  • Make an agenda of questions for Schnitzer and then have a conf call
    • some input on what Mark Schnitzer wants to do
      • look at primary microscope data at level of groups of cells
      • access literature related to connections that they see (e.g., specific database I can't remember)
      • generate hypotheses (about?)
      • identify experiments to do
      • pose or test models
  • other local brain scientists
    • Win Gongvatana/Ron Cohen
    • Steve Correia (VA)
    • David Badre
    • Michael Frank
    • Steve Sloman (reasoning, decision making) (mind, not brain)
    • Thomas Serre (modeling specific vision-related circuits)
    • everyone in CLiPS
  • some preliminary demo that goes beyond correlative analysis to a causal system
    • this might be a completely different proposal...
  • Observe brain scientists analyze with diagrams & summarize
    • Paper diagrams,
    • Something they actually use
    • Commercial (Tableau) or other existing tools
    • Postits “interface” (data & analysis results)
    • build on Agrawal et al and have students design a system
      • then pull out design principles, perhaps cognitively motivated
      • use proxy task based on social network analysis that would be student friendly
  • automatically detect cognitive load from voice analysis (or galvanic skin response? or facial expression?)
  • diagram recommender
  • open-source repository
    • Caputured video of index card experiments
    • library of brain imagery
    • Codings of video
    • Way for others to contribute codings (incentivized?)
  • taxtonomy of tasks (or design space) for #1
  • cognitive skills of brain scientists (spatial, visual/textual, WM size, prob solving, ... )