CS295J/Literature to read for week 5.11: Difference between revisions

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
* [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1070747 An Insight-Based Methodology for Evaluating Bioinformatics Visualizations], Saraiya, North, and Duca, TVCG 2005
* [http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1070747 An Insight-Based Methodology for Evaluating Bioinformatics Visualizations], Saraiya, North, and Duca, TVCG 2005
: (Owner: [[User:Steven Gomez|Steven Gomez]])
: (Owner: [[User:Steven Gomez|Steven Gomez]])
This paper describes an evaluation methodology based on insights gained from exploratory visualization tools.  There are several drawbacks related to the difficulty of the method (e.g., coding insights), but an insight-based evaluation or some variation might be a good choice for the brain diagram tool.  I wonder if it's possible to use predictive modeling to code insights (e.g., finding "Aha" moments using GSR or other features) to semi-automate some parts of the methodology that make it hard to use.


* [http://vis.cs.brown.edu/~trevor/Papers/Kaptelinin-1994-ATI.pdf Activity Theory: Implications for Human-Computer Interaction], Kaptelinin
* [http://vis.cs.brown.edu/~trevor/Papers/Kaptelinin-1994-ATI.pdf Activity Theory: Implications for Human-Computer Interaction], Kaptelinin

Revision as of 15:51, 6 October 2011

(Owner: David)
(Owner: Steven Gomez)

This paper describes an evaluation methodology based on insights gained from exploratory visualization tools. There are several drawbacks related to the difficulty of the method (e.g., coding insights), but an insight-based evaluation or some variation might be a good choice for the brain diagram tool. I wonder if it's possible to use predictive modeling to code insights (e.g., finding "Aha" moments using GSR or other features) to semi-automate some parts of the methodology that make it hard to use.

(Owner: Hua)
(Owner: Wenjun)