CS295J/Literature to read for class 4: Difference between revisions

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:


* [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1357054.1357069&coll=portal&dl=ACM&type=series&idx=SERIES260&part=series&WantType=Proceedings&title=CHI&CFID=21773966&CFTOKEN=71582577 Communication chains and multitasking] (CHI, 2008)
* [http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1357054.1357069&coll=portal&dl=ACM&type=series&idx=SERIES260&part=series&WantType=Proceedings&title=CHI&CFID=21773966&CFTOKEN=71582577 Communication chains and multitasking] (CHI, 2008)
:Extensive qualitative data on how users multi-task in an ecologically valid environment in terms of ''communication chains'', a concept the authors develop.  This paper includes a predictive component and so promises to be quite relevant to our work.  (Andrew Bragdon)
:Extensive qualitative data on how users multi-task in an ecologically valid environment in terms of ''communication chains'', a concept the authors develop based on previous work.  This paper includes a predictive component and so promises to be quite relevant to our work.  (Andrew Bragdon)


:''I have included the year in the title - maybe we should start doing this so we can easily see when papers were done (just a thought)''
:''I have included the year in the title - maybe we should start doing this so we can easily see when papers were done (just a thought)''

Revision as of 15:43, 10 February 2009

Comparative Task Analysis, Ruven Brooks, 1991 (pdf file here: File:Brooks-1991-CTA.pdf)

Extensive qualitative data on how users multi-task in an ecologically valid environment in terms of communication chains, a concept the authors develop based on previous work. This paper includes a predictive component and so promises to be quite relevant to our work. (Andrew Bragdon)
I have included the year in the title - maybe we should start doing this so we can easily see when papers were done (just a thought)
Have yet to decide which article to use, but likely the first or second. (Steven)