CS295J/Literature to read for week 4.11: Difference between revisions

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Chen Xu (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
* [http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/115.pdf Cognitive Design Principles for Visualizations] Heiser-2003-CDP
* [http://csjarchive.cogsci.rpi.edu/proceedings/2003/pdfs/115.pdf Cognitive Design Principles for Visualizations] Heiser-2003-CDP
: Claims that the design of visualizations can be informed by cognitive principles and, based on those principles, be automated. Their research has implications in any domain in which visualization in useful, including our proposed project. This is relevant to Jenna's response to reviewer #4, by showing that cognitive principles can and have been implemented in the design of visualizations. (Owner: Michael, Discussant: ?, Discussant: ?)
: Claims that the design of visualizations can be informed by cognitive principles and, based on those principles, be automated. Their research has implications in any domain in which visualization in useful, including our proposed project. This is relevant to Jenna's response to reviewer #4, by showing that cognitive principles can and have been implemented in the design of visualizations. (Owner: Michael, Discussant: ?, Discussant: ?)
* [http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpls/abs_all.jsp?arnumber=1335677&tag=1 Visual variability analysis for goal models] Gonzales-2004-VVA
: This work first proposes a visual variability analysis technique, it analyses the correlation between functional goal models and softgoals(requirements variants), and tries to find the most satisfactory goal models and requirements. This can be used to illustrate  how cognitive models like goal maintainence and multi task can be designed and achieved in our project. And the paper also implemented a tool to support  the technique and this could give us some insights of how to put cognitive model into practice. (Owner: Chen, Discussant: ?, Discussant: ?)

Revision as of 07:41, 27 September 2011

Again, discusses a way to evaluate a user's cognitive load. Again, this is relevant to the reviewers comments that there lacked a plan to evaluate how well the visualizations would jive with cognitive principles. If we are using them properly, then cognitive load levels would be low.
This paper tempts to integrate statistics methodology and visualizations in interactive exploratory tools. The authors conduct long term case studies to evaluate this approach, which give positive results about the effectiveness of the approach.
The paper is an example of how exploratory tool can be evaluated in a long-term manner.
Claims that the design of visualizations can be informed by cognitive principles and, based on those principles, be automated. Their research has implications in any domain in which visualization in useful, including our proposed project. This is relevant to Jenna's response to reviewer #4, by showing that cognitive principles can and have been implemented in the design of visualizations. (Owner: Michael, Discussant: ?, Discussant: ?)
This work first proposes a visual variability analysis technique, it analyses the correlation between functional goal models and softgoals(requirements variants), and tries to find the most satisfactory goal models and requirements. This can be used to illustrate how cognitive models like goal maintainence and multi task can be designed and achieved in our project. And the paper also implemented a tool to support the technique and this could give us some insights of how to put cognitive model into practice. (Owner: Chen, Discussant: ?, Discussant: ?)