User:Cagatay Demiralp: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is an "in contrast to" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, classify the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising these two also looked at the invariant classes in their subject of interest. | Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is an "in contrast to" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, classify the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that these two also looked at the invariant classes in their subject of interest. | ||
Revision as of 19:00, 21 June 2010
Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is an "in contrast to" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, classify the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind busy recently. Right, it is not surprising that these two also looked at the invariant classes in their subject of interest.