CS295J/Class 8: Difference between revisions
< CS295J
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
* new preliminary results | * new preliminary results | ||
* review readings | * review readings | ||
** embodied models as simulated users | ** embodied models as simulated users, 2001 | ||
**: (mention crowd movement economist article?) | **: (mention crowd movement economist article?) | ||
**: cognitive architectures -- could the book I scanned TOC from provide one? | |||
**: some nice related work at low level (static analysis, GLEAN, Act-R) | |||
**: an embodied agent could be great for testing | |||
**: how should sketching fit into UI design? getting too detailed too fast can create problems | |||
Revision as of 20:12, 12 March 2009
- review proposal reviews
- (I guess my template wasn't detailed enough...)
- discuss intellectual merits and what to focus on
- volunteer for some gap-filling (great stuff!)
- new preliminary results
- review readings
- embodied models as simulated users, 2001
- (mention crowd movement economist article?)
- cognitive architectures -- could the book I scanned TOC from provide one?
- some nice related work at low level (static analysis, GLEAN, Act-R)
- an embodied agent could be great for testing
- how should sketching fit into UI design? getting too detailed too fast can create problems
- embodied models as simulated users, 2001