CS295J/Literature to read for class 6: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 16:50, 6 March 2009

Mike Tarr suggested: Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain by Randall C. O'Reilly, Yuko Munakata, and James L. McClelland (Paperback - Sep 4, 2000) as the font of knowledge about modeling cognition. I would suggest that everyone look through the table of contents of this book to see if it seems worth pursuing w.r.t. interaction.

This is hardly a must-read, but might be interesting to some. It shows that categorization can be as fast when based on rule-based thought as when based on similarity-based thought.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 [http://www.amazon.com/Computational-Explorations-Cognitive-Neuroscience-Understanding/dp/0262650541/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1235620588&sr=1-1 Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain by Randall C. O'Reilly, Yuko Munakata, and James L. McClelland (Paperback - Sep 4, 2000)]
 as the font of knowledge about modeling cognition.  I would suggest that everyone look through the table of contents of this book to see if it seems worth pursuing w.r.t. interaction.
+[http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&ct=res&cd=2&url=http%3A%2F%2Fpalmlab.dynalias.net%2Fwp-content%2Fuploads%2FFile%2FLuhmann-Ahn-Palmeri-cogsci2002.pdf&ei=qlOxScy6FZWWMqaPwO8E&usg=AFQjCNHMp4mIA__zBwJ5kFWgpGHJuVcDzQ&sig2=qbPUNXNKkIGxE0VDGRljEw Theories and Similarity: Categorization under Speeded Conditions] Luhmann, Ahn, Palmeri (xxxx).
+# This is hardly a must-read, but might be interesting to some. It shows that categorization can be as fast when based on rule-based thought as when based on similarity-based thought.