CS295J/Literature to read for class 8: Difference between revisions
< CS295J
Adam Darlow (talk | contribs) Added a survey paper on simulating users |
No edit summary |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Ritter, F. E., & Young, R. M. (2001). [http://acs.ist.psu.edu/papers/ijhcs-em-si/ritterY01.pdf Embodied models as simulated users: Introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 1-14 | * Ritter, F. E., & Young, R. M. (2001). [http://acs.ist.psu.edu/papers/ijhcs-em-si/ritterY01.pdf Embodied models as simulated users: Introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design]. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 1-14 | ||
This will give us an idea of where the field is, or was 8 years ago. (Adam) | This will give us an idea of where the field is, or was 8 years ago. (Adam) | ||
* [http://sumi.ucc.ie/ Software Usability Measurement Inventory (SUMI)] | |||
This is a battery of questions, some of which are distracters, that measure user affect ("perceived quality"). This battery has been run against a bunch of standard applications and so when the test is administered the scores can be normalized and compared relative to a known range. (OWNER: Andrew Bragdon) | |||
* [http://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6VDC-4811TNB-5&_user=10&_rdoc=1&_fmt=&_orig=search&_sort=d&view=c&_acct=C000050221&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=10&md5=259b5c105222437fc84990b7a1eaedee The role of cognitive theory in human–computer interface]. Chalmers, Patricia A, 2003. [[User:E J Kalafarski|E J Kalafarski]] 13:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
* [http://infolab.uvt.nl/research/lap2003/agerfalk.pdf Actability Principles in Theory and Practice]. Agerfalk, Par J, 2003. (''Only'' section 2.1 is relevant to us, but it makes a cursory effort at parsing some common principles out of design guidelines. Worth noting, but there is probably no need to read this paper.) [[User:E J Kalafarski|E J Kalafarski]] 13:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC) | |||
* [http://www.aaai.org/Papers/Workshops/1998/WS-98-09/WS98-09-020.pdf Acting on a visual world: The role of multimodal perception in HCI]. Wolff, F., Angelia, A., Romary, L. (1998). From: AAAI Technical Report WS-98-09. (Jon) | |||
Latest revision as of 00:15, 17 March 2009
- Ritter, F. E., & Young, R. M. (2001). Embodied models as simulated users: Introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55, 1-14
This will give us an idea of where the field is, or was 8 years ago. (Adam)
This is a battery of questions, some of which are distracters, that measure user affect ("perceived quality"). This battery has been run against a bunch of standard applications and so when the test is administered the scores can be normalized and compared relative to a known range. (OWNER: Andrew Bragdon)
- The role of cognitive theory in human–computer interface. Chalmers, Patricia A, 2003. E J Kalafarski 13:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Actability Principles in Theory and Practice. Agerfalk, Par J, 2003. (Only section 2.1 is relevant to us, but it makes a cursory effort at parsing some common principles out of design guidelines. Worth noting, but there is probably no need to read this paper.) E J Kalafarski 13:44, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- Acting on a visual world: The role of multimodal perception in HCI. Wolff, F., Angelia, A., Romary, L. (1998). From: AAAI Technical Report WS-98-09. (Jon)