CS295J/Class 11: Difference between revisions
< CS295J
New page: * papers ** from last class ** and one about "insight" from this week * gotta get tough with the proposal |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
* read CPM-GOMS and consider as theme ('''[[User:E J Kalafarski|E J Kalafarski]]''', '''Eric''', '''Jon''', '''Gideon''', '''[[User:Trevor O'Brien|Trevor]]''', '''[[User:Steven Ellis|Steven]]''', '''Ian''') | |||
* converge proposal (ID weaknesses & fix or propose fixes) | |||
** make contributions and aims agree ('''[[User:Trevor O'Brien|Trevor]]''') | |||
** make contributions and aims compelling and significant | |||
*** intro acceptable (merge the two best) ('''[[User:E J Kalafarski|E J Kalafarski]]''': will rewrite intro, merging the two best "in progress" intros, with an emphasis on the project's interdisciplinary aspect) | |||
*** improves world, lots of people, in big ways, long time ('''[[User:E J Kalafarski|E J Kalafarski]]''': will brainstorm and add to "big picture" contributions, but someone else should brainstorm this as well, '''Eric''') | |||
*** extends knowledge, increased productivity (designers and users) ('''Eric''') | |||
*** bg & significance section consistent with contribs/aims ('''Ian''') | |||
* try CPM-GOMS, maybe w/ 1 extension ('''Gideon''', '''[[User:Steven Ellis|Steven]]''') | |||
* what's input and output (architecture)? ('''[[User:E J Kalafarski|E J Kalafarski]]''': will attempt to come up with an architecture that accommodates all seven proposed modules and presents a simple, useful final product, ''Jon: Will brainstorm b/c I've been wondering about this for a long time'', '''Adam''', '''[[User:Trevor O'Brien|Trevor]]''') | |||
* Gajos paper ('''[[User:E J Kalafarski|E J Kalafarski]]''': will read, consider architecture method, '''Adam''', '''[[User:Trevor O'Brien|Trevor]]''') | |||
* papers | * papers | ||
** from last class | ** from last class | ||
** and one about "insight" from this week | ** and one about "insight" from this week | ||
* gotta get tough with the proposal | * gotta get tough with the proposal | ||
Latest revision as of 21:55, 9 April 2009
- read CPM-GOMS and consider as theme (E J Kalafarski, Eric, Jon, Gideon, Trevor, Steven, Ian)
- converge proposal (ID weaknesses & fix or propose fixes)
- make contributions and aims agree (Trevor)
- make contributions and aims compelling and significant
- intro acceptable (merge the two best) (E J Kalafarski: will rewrite intro, merging the two best "in progress" intros, with an emphasis on the project's interdisciplinary aspect)
- improves world, lots of people, in big ways, long time (E J Kalafarski: will brainstorm and add to "big picture" contributions, but someone else should brainstorm this as well, Eric)
- extends knowledge, increased productivity (designers and users) (Eric)
- bg & significance section consistent with contribs/aims (Ian)
- try CPM-GOMS, maybe w/ 1 extension (Gideon, Steven)
- what's input and output (architecture)? (E J Kalafarski: will attempt to come up with an architecture that accommodates all seven proposed modules and presents a simple, useful final product, Jon: Will brainstorm b/c I've been wondering about this for a long time, Adam, Trevor)
- Gajos paper (E J Kalafarski: will read, consider architecture method, Adam, Trevor)
- papers
- from last class
- and one about "insight" from this week
- gotta get tough with the proposal