CS295J/Class 10: Difference between revisions
< CS295J
New page: * intro evals ** metrics *** C: bring cognitive and perceptual modeling to bear in principled way on HCI design *** S: scoped to 5 people over 5 years *** I: high impact *** N: innovation ... |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 18:17, 2 April 2009
- intro evals
- metrics
- C: bring cognitive and perceptual modeling to bear in principled way on HCI design
- S: scoped to 5 people over 5 years
- I: high impact
- N: innovation
- A: analytical domain (supports hard thinking)
- metrics
- global comments
- more explicit what/how
- "We propose" at start and "five years ... $2.5M" by Gideon and Jon excellent -- emulate!
- terser
- a concrete thing for the $2.5M would be good; what will they get as opposed to what will we do? a theoretical foundation? better UI's? a system for automatically evaluating UI's? new knowledge about cognition?
- steven + (adam, trevor, gideon | gideon and jon) would capture everything
- Meta-work and Task-Interruption Support Interfaces (andrew)
- (100) C=20, S=20, I=40%, N=20% (too focused on CS domain, scope too small, needs to appear to move outside HCI more, innovation unclear, good balance between rhetoric and specifics)
- Collaborative 2 (need better title) (adam, trevor, gideon)
- (220) C=60%, S=40, I=60%, N=60% ("computational models" too vague, good goal for connection to psych, probably need more specifics and tighter language to make them fit, hard to scope)
- alternative collaborative (still need better title) (adam, trevor, gideon)
- (270) C=70%, S=60, I=70%, N=70% (nice 1st para, 2nd para a little mushy, 3rd para needs work)
- A Distributed Cognition Model of Human-Computer Interaction (gideon and jon)
- (270) C=70%, S=70, I=70%, N=60% (a bit abstract, nice connection between areas, explicit scope good, question strange, focus on distributed cognition intriguing although it may be risky, "gaps" bit sounds too much like fishing)
- EJ (need a better title) (ej)
- (200) C=60%, S=40, I=50%, N=50% (too rambling at start: more solution less problem, hidden "we propose", scope hard to eval)
- A Behavioral/Cognitive Model of Human-Computer Interaction (steven)
- (190) iC=40%, S=50, I=40%, N=60% (good concrete goals and activities, "doomed to antiquation" great, not enough application)
- global comments
- pick out proposal-relevant aspects of new readings
- finish preliminary results section you have been working on (it will have been 30 hours!)
- assignment
- finish preliminary results section you have been working on (it will have been 30 hours!)
- critical enough?
- are we getting rid of non-contributions?
- list of cost/benefits for contributions