User:Jadrian Miles/Diffusion simulation: Difference between revisions

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Jadrian Miles (talk | contribs)
New page: * Axon gauges in range 0.25 -- 10 μm (wzhou cite 1) * Hindered diffusion differs from free diffusion by a "tortuosity" value (Nicholson "Diffusion and related transport mechanisms" '01)...
 
Jadrian Miles (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
* Axon gauges in range 0.25 -- 10 μm (wzhou cite 1)
* Axon gauges in range 0.25 -- 10 μm (wzhou cite 1).  "Extra-thick" axons (~20μm) are rare; about 3% occurrence at most, and only in certain structures.
* Hindered diffusion differs from free diffusion by a "tortuosity" value (Nicholson "Diffusion and related transport mechanisms" '01)
* Hindered diffusion differs from free diffusion by a "tortuosity" value (Nicholson "Diffusion and related transport mechanisms" '01)
* Volume fraction is ~80% intra? (Nilsson MRI '08)
* Volume fraction is ~80% intra? (Nilsson MRI '08)
Line 5: Line 5:
* &tau;<sub>intra</sub> ~= 306 ms (but authors claim it's a bad fit) (ibid) (exchange times; see page 178 and ref 35)
* &tau;<sub>intra</sub> ~= 306 ms (but authors claim it's a bad fit) (ibid) (exchange times; see page 178 and ref 35)


Human histology would be useful: hand-compute volume fraction of intracellular fluid, extracellular fluid, and myelin, as well as axon gauges.
What about parallel DWIs and microscale histology on a sheep or macaque brain?
Parameters:
* direction: 1, 2, n
* directional coherence: ignore, scalar
* exchange: ignore, constant, per-compartment
* isotropic D: constant globally, constant intra / extra, per-compartment
* gauge: constant, per-compartment, fixed distribution, distribution per-compartment
* volume fraction: intra / extra, per-compartment


Human histology would be useful: hand-compute volume fraction of intracellular fluid, extracellular fluid, and myelin, as well as axon gauges.
The experiment:
# Generate lots of detailed 1-voxel numerical phantoms and run diffusion simulation on them to generate DWIs in a dense sampling of q-space.  Now you have ground truth (kinda).
# For a given phantom, fix all parameters but two at known correct values and then analyze the ambiguity between the free parameters.  Treat one as independent and vary its assumed value; find the value of the other that best recreates the DWIs.  Your output is a dependent-variable value ''and'' a DWI error.
# For each pair of parameters, scatter-plot (or multi-line plot) the relationship between them over all phantoms.
# Generalize some ambiguity rules and theorize about 'em.

Latest revision as of 01:08, 24 March 2009

  • Axon gauges in range 0.25 -- 10 μm (wzhou cite 1). "Extra-thick" axons (~20μm) are rare; about 3% occurrence at most, and only in certain structures.
  • Hindered diffusion differs from free diffusion by a "tortuosity" value (Nicholson "Diffusion and related transport mechanisms" '01)
  • Volume fraction is ~80% intra? (Nilsson MRI '08)
  • Extracellular free D ~= 1.08 μm2/ms (ibid)
  • τintra ~= 306 ms (but authors claim it's a bad fit) (ibid) (exchange times; see page 178 and ref 35)

Human histology would be useful: hand-compute volume fraction of intracellular fluid, extracellular fluid, and myelin, as well as axon gauges.

What about parallel DWIs and microscale histology on a sheep or macaque brain?

Parameters:

  • direction: 1, 2, n
  • directional coherence: ignore, scalar
  • exchange: ignore, constant, per-compartment
  • isotropic D: constant globally, constant intra / extra, per-compartment
  • gauge: constant, per-compartment, fixed distribution, distribution per-compartment
  • volume fraction: intra / extra, per-compartment

The experiment:

  1. Generate lots of detailed 1-voxel numerical phantoms and run diffusion simulation on them to generate DWIs in a dense sampling of q-space. Now you have ground truth (kinda).
  2. For a given phantom, fix all parameters but two at known correct values and then analyze the ambiguity between the free parameters. Treat one as independent and vary its assumed value; find the value of the other that best recreates the DWIs. Your output is a dependent-variable value and a DWI error.
  3. For each pair of parameters, scatter-plot (or multi-line plot) the relationship between them over all phantoms.
  4. Generalize some ambiguity rules and theorize about 'em.