CS295J/Class Members' Pages/Gideon/Week 1: Difference between revisions

From VrlWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
==Literature Keys==
==Literature Keys==
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition Clark-1998-TEM]
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition Clark-1998-TEM]
**Owner, Evaluator
**Poster, Owner, Evaluator
**[[#Summaries | Summary]]
**[[#Summaries | Summary]]
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Perception Scholl-2000-PCA]
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Perception Scholl-2000-PCA]
Line 10: Line 10:
**Discussant
**Discussant
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]
**Poster, Evaluated
**Poster, Evaluator
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition Evans-2003-ITM]
**Poster, Evaluator


==Summaries==
==Summaries==
Line 23: Line 25:
*It's not unreasonable to assume an advanced player will take this one step further, achieving a perfect state of efficiency in play, only moving when absolutely necessary.
*It's not unreasonable to assume an advanced player will take this one step further, achieving a perfect state of efficiency in play, only moving when absolutely necessary.


However, this is not the case! In fact, an advanced player's actions, in many ways, resemble those of a complete beginner. Namely, the expert WILL make moves which, though seemingly unnecessary), are taking advantage of the computers ability to do the same thing he/she would be doing, but better.
However, this is not the case! In fact, an advanced player's actions, in many ways, resemble those of a complete beginner. Namely, the expert WILL make moves which, though seemingly unnecessary, are taking advantage of the computers ability to do the same thing he/she would be doing, but better.


Concretely...
Concretely...


<table cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0" border="1">
<table cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" border="1">
<tr>
<tr>
<td>Action</td><td>time [ms]</td>
<td><b>Action</b></td><td><b>time [ms]</b></td>
</tr>
</tr>
<tr>
<tr>
Line 42: Line 44:
</table>
</table>


Mental deliberation can be slow, and in this case, the brain's RPM for tetris pieces is much higher. Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. If you believe Google makes us smarter (as opposed to dumber), you would agree. The additional notion that cognition is actually taking place in the active external reality might be difficult to believe at first. For example, Consider the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.
Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. Consider the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.


*1) We can write directions down on paper.
*1) We can write directions down on paper.
Line 48: Line 50:
*3) We can insert them into our neural implants which integrate with memory and spatial navigation systems.
*3) We can insert them into our neural implants which integrate with memory and spatial navigation systems.


Are the three cases so different? Are we more willing to say the ink on paper is less cognitive than the implant? This paper argues that indeed these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.
This paper argues that these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.
 
People often subconsciously make use of computer resources, and knowing which ones and to what degree will help us predict how users will interact with a system.
 


==Helpful Links==
==Helpful Links==
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]
*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]

Latest revision as of 16:15, 30 January 2009

Literature Keys

Summaries

Clark-1998-TEM

The Extended Mind

We should not limit our notion of cognition to something taking place only within the skull. Instead, we can think about actively incorporating the external environment (or being incorporated into it), forming a single-system loop of cognition. To help understand this in terms of how we might utilize a computer's resources, consider the following:

  • A beginner tetris player will often "unnecessarily" rotate pieces and move them about before deciding (or being forced to decide) on a final orientation.
  • An intermediate tetris player will make fewer "wasteful" moves because he/she will have had the training and/or metal power to perform these simple calculations in his/her head.
  • It's not unreasonable to assume an advanced player will take this one step further, achieving a perfect state of efficiency in play, only moving when absolutely necessary.

However, this is not the case! In fact, an advanced player's actions, in many ways, resemble those of a complete beginner. Namely, the expert WILL make moves which, though seemingly unnecessary, are taking advantage of the computers ability to do the same thing he/she would be doing, but better.

Concretely...

Actiontime [ms]
Plan a button press200
Computerized piece rotation100
Mental rotation1000

Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. Consider the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.

  • 1) We can write directions down on paper.
  • 2) We can map them on our iPhones.
  • 3) We can insert them into our neural implants which integrate with memory and spatial navigation systems.

This paper argues that these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.

People often subconsciously make use of computer resources, and knowing which ones and to what degree will help us predict how users will interact with a system.


Helpful Links