User:Cagatay Demiralp - Revision history

Cagatay Demiralp at 22:31, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T22:31:42Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:31, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<big>Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref> </big>		<big>Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "''If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village''"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref> </big>

Cagatay Demiralp at 22:30, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T22:30:59Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref>		<big>Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref> </big>

Cagatay Demiralp at 22:30, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T22:30:06Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:30, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref>		Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref>

Cagatay Demiralp at 22:29, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T22:29:36Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:29, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref>		Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref>

Cagatay Demiralp at 22:27, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T22:27:47Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:27, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small>~~Probably~~ you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></ref>		Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small><small>probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></small></ref>

Cagatay Demiralp at 22:26, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T22:26:21Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:26, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a toolsmith I would have stayed in my village"?<ref>~~No,~~ he didn't say that. I'm just kidding:-).</ref>		Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a '''toolsmith''' I would have stayed in my village"?<ref><small>Probably you didn't know about it because he didn't say anything like that... I'm just kidding:-).</small></ref>
























			<references />

Cagatay Demiralp at 22:08, 30 June 2010

2010-06-30T22:08:19Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:08, 30 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest.		Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest. Did you also know that the famous Brazilian educator P. Freire once said "If I had ever wanted to be a toolsmith I would have stayed in my village"?<ref>No, he didn't say that. I'm just kidding:-).</ref>

Cagatay Demiralp at 00:47, 22 June 2010

2010-06-22T00:47:50Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:47, 22 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, ~~classify~~ the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the ~~invariant~~ classes in their subject of interest.		Marx and Engels once thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, categorize (i.e., find equivalence classes) the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the equivalence classes in their subject of interest.

Cagatay Demiralp at 20:07, 21 June 2010

2010-06-21T20:07:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 21 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, classify the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the two also looked at the invariant classes in their subject of interest.		Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, classify the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the these two men also looked at the invariant classes in their subject of interest.

Cagatay Demiralp at 20:05, 21 June 2010

2010-06-21T20:05:31Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:05, 21 June 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is an "in contrast to" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, classify the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that ~~these~~ two also looked at the invariant classes in their subject of interest.		Marx and Engels thought the contrast between the essence and appearance of things was the source of "all" science. Whether it is a "contrast" relation or not, the desire to understand and, hence, classify the profound relation between form and function is what keeps my mind [http://www.cs.brown.edu/~cad/ busy] recently. Right, it is not surprising that the two also looked at the invariant classes in their subject of interest.