New CAVE Design - Revision history

David Laidlaw: /* Charge for Dec 31 2010 final implementation plan */

2010-11-09T16:45:18Z

Charge for Dec 31 2010 final implementation plan

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:45, 9 November 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	=== For Nov 16 2010 meeting ===		=== For Nov 16 2010 meeting ===

	sgf: new projector plan		* sgf: new projector plan
	dhl: facilities contact and plan for space committee		* dhl: facilities contact and plan for space committee
			* dhl: get 2 stereo projectors

			=== For Nov 16 2010 meeting ===

			* asf,brad: vrg3d

	=== For Nov 9 2010 meeting ===		=== For Nov 9 2010 meeting ===


	* jvr may attend via skype/phone		* jvr may attend via skype/phone

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 9 2010 meeting */

2010-11-09T16:39:54Z

For Nov 9 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:39, 9 November 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:

	The charge is to have screen material ordered, projector supports defined and possibly ordered, blending and projectors, all engineering drawings done, floor decided and ordered. Do we need any software dealt with during this time? AMIRA Aviso? VRG3D?		The charge is to have screen material ordered, projector supports defined and possibly ordered, blending and projectors, all engineering drawings done, floor decided and ordered. Do we need any software dealt with during this time? AMIRA Aviso? VRG3D?

			=== For Nov 16 2010 meeting ===

			sgf: new projector plan
			dhl: facilities contact and plan for space committee

	=== For Nov 9 2010 meeting ===		=== For Nov 9 2010 meeting ===


	* jvr may attend via skype/phone		* jvr may attend via skype/phone
Line 33:		Line 39:
	* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232, but maybe that's a feature]		* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232, but maybe that's a feature]
	* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (4th try)		* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (4th try)

	* jnh: scope renovations		* jnh: scope renovations
	* sgf: facilities input re room possibilities (and costs?) [cliff resnick top dog; bobbie delegated]		* sgf: facilities input re room possibilities (and costs?) [cliff resnick top dog; bobbie delegated]
			* sgf: splint experiment of 2mm from engineering
	* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing		* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing
	* sgf: splint experiment of 2mm from engineering
	* sgf: approach for faster iteration		* sgf: approach for faster iteration
	* sgf: bigger piece of 1.2 matte screen material		* sgf: bigger piece of 1.2 matte screen material
	* sgf: color management conf call results to help decide whether to pay for internal color management (projector choice)		* sgf: color management conf call results to help decide whether to pay for internal color management (projector choice) [prob no CMS]
	* sgf+jnh: lay out the arguments for the two cases of color management; need scalable cost estimate, as well (find out about controls for both conditions)		* sgf+jnh: lay out the arguments for the two cases of color management; need scalable cost estimate, as well (find out about controls for both conditions)
	* sgf: find out from Rod what controls and interface on the two projectors we're considering		* sgf: find out from Rod what controls and interface on the two projectors we're considering

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 9 2010 meeting */

2010-11-09T16:25:48Z

For Nov 9 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 9 November 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:

	* jvr may attend via skype/phone		* jvr may attend via skype/phone
	* new topic: projector latency		* new topic: projector latency [jvc now says 4-5 frames latency (!); "frame" not defined; stereo may be only 24FPS?; half-res maybe; sharp XVZ7000?-full 1080p stereo; mono projectors self-switching to black?]
	* all: jvr role in projector holders		* all: jvr role in projector holders
	* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232, but maybe that's a feature]		* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232, but maybe that's a feature]
	* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (4th try)		* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (4th try)

	* jnh: scope renovations		* jnh: scope renovations
	* sgf: facilities input re room possibilities (and costs?)		* sgf: facilities input re room possibilities (and costs?) [cliff resnick top dog; bobbie delegated]

	* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing		* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing
	* sgf: splint experiment of 2mm from engineering		* sgf: splint experiment of 2mm from engineering

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 9 2010 meeting */

2010-11-08T22:20:24Z

For Nov 9 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:20, 8 November 2010
Line 42:		Line 42:
	* sgf+jnh: lay out the arguments for the two cases of color management; need scalable cost estimate, as well (find out about controls for both conditions)		* sgf+jnh: lay out the arguments for the two cases of color management; need scalable cost estimate, as well (find out about controls for both conditions)
	* sgf: find out from Rod what controls and interface on the two projectors we're considering		* sgf: find out from Rod what controls and interface on the two projectors we're considering
			* dhl: is it time to get demos from Tom, despite our concerns?
	* asf: VRG3D build proposal for "make" installation on linux		* asf: VRG3D build proposal for "make" installation on linux
	* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses		* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 9 2010 meeting */

2010-11-08T21:03:23Z

For Nov 9 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:03, 8 November 2010
Line 28:		Line 28:
	=== For Nov 9 2010 meeting ===		=== For Nov 9 2010 meeting ===

	* ~~brad~~: ~~one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses~~		* jvr may attend via skype/phone
			* new topic: projector latency
	* all: jvr role in projector holders		* all: jvr role in projector holders
	* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232]		* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232, but maybe that's a feature]
	* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (4th try)		* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (4th try)
	* jnh: scope renovations		* jnh: scope renovations
			* sgf: facilities input re room possibilities (and costs?)
	* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing		* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing
	* sgf: ~~everything~~ from ~~last meeting~~		* sgf: splint experiment of 2mm from engineering
	* ~~new topic~~: ~~splitting up work~~ on ~~mounts and alignment platforms (could~~ we ~~skip alignment?)~~		* sgf: approach for faster iteration
	* ~~jvr may attend via skype~~/~~phone~~		* sgf: bigger piece of 1.2 matte screen material
			* sgf: color management conf call results to help decide whether to pay for internal color management (projector choice)
			* sgf+jnh: lay out the arguments for the two cases of color management; need scalable cost estimate, as well (find out about controls for both conditions)
			* sgf: find out from Rod what controls and interface on the two projectors we're considering
			* asf: VRG3D build proposal for "make" installation on linux
			* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses

	=== For Nov 2 2010 meeting ===		=== For Nov 2 2010 meeting ===

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 2 2010 meeting */

2010-11-08T21:00:13Z

For Nov 2 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:00, 8 November 2010
Line 25:		Line 25:

	The charge is to have screen material ordered, projector supports defined and possibly ordered, blending and projectors, all engineering drawings done, floor decided and ordered. Do we need any software dealt with during this time? AMIRA Aviso? VRG3D?		The charge is to have screen material ordered, projector supports defined and possibly ordered, blending and projectors, all engineering drawings done, floor decided and ordered. Do we need any software dealt with during this time? AMIRA Aviso? VRG3D?

			=== For Nov 9 2010 meeting ===

			* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses
			* all: jvr role in projector holders
			* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232]
			* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (4th try)
			* jnh: scope renovations
			* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing
			* sgf: everything from last meeting
			* new topic: splitting up work on mounts and alignment platforms (could we skip alignment?)
			* jvr may attend via skype/phone

	=== For Nov 2 2010 meeting ===		=== For Nov 2 2010 meeting ===

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 2 2010 meeting */

2010-11-02T15:26:45Z

For Nov 2 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:26, 2 November 2010
Line 30:		Line 30:
	* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses		* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses
	* all: jvr role in projector holders		* all: jvr role in projector holders
	* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs)		* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs) [no ethernet on 40, only RS232]
	* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (3rd try)		* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (3rd try) [several e-mails out]
	* jnh: scope renovations		* jnh: scope renovations [haven't started, by end of week]
			* jnh: prep to talk to integrators at supercomputing
	* sgf: everything from last meeting		* sgf: everything from last meeting
	* new topic: splitting up work on mounts and alignment platforms (could we skip alignment?)		* new topic: splitting up work on mounts and alignment platforms (could we skip alignment?)

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 2 2010 meeting */

2010-10-20T20:57:52Z

For Nov 2 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:57, 20 October 2010
Line 34:		Line 34:
	* jnh: scope renovations		* jnh: scope renovations
	* sgf: everything from last meeting		* sgf: everything from last meeting
			* new topic: splitting up work on mounts and alignment platforms (could we skip alignment?)
			* jvr may attend via skype/phone

	=== For Oct 19 2010 meeting ===		=== For Oct 19 2010 meeting ===

David Laidlaw: /* For Nov 2 2010 meeting */

2010-10-20T16:25:15Z

For Nov 2 2010 meeting

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:25, 20 October 2010
Line 29:		Line 29:

	* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses		* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses
			* all: jvr role in projector holders
	* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs)		* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs)
	* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (3rd try)		* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (3rd try)

David Laidlaw: /* Charge for Dec 31 2010 final implementation plan */

2010-10-19T15:38:38Z

Charge for Dec 31 2010 final implementation plan

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:38, 19 October 2010
Line 26:		Line 26:
	The charge is to have screen material ordered, projector supports defined and possibly ordered, blending and projectors, all engineering drawings done, floor decided and ordered. Do we need any software dealt with during this time? AMIRA Aviso? VRG3D?		The charge is to have screen material ordered, projector supports defined and possibly ordered, blending and projectors, all engineering drawings done, floor decided and ordered. Do we need any software dealt with during this time? AMIRA Aviso? VRG3D?

	=== For ~~Oct 20~~ 2010 meeting ===		=== For Nov 2 2010 meeting ===

	=== For Oct 20 2010 meeting ===		* brad: one-command VRG3D download/build/install that asf blesses
			* jnh: pro/cons for 40 vs. 50 decision (query Rod via e-mail for any needs)
			* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (3rd try)
			* jnh: scope renovations
			* sgf: everything from last meeting

			=== For Oct 19 2010 meeting ===

	* dhl: get distortion measurements onto Sam or John's list		* dhl: get distortion measurements onto Sam or John's list
			** john already did it!
	* sgf: splint experiment of 2mm from engineering		* sgf: splint experiment of 2mm from engineering
	* sgf: approach for faster iteration		* sgf: approach for faster iteration
	* sgf: bigger piece of 1.2 matte screen material		* sgf: bigger piece of 1.2 matte screen material
	* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (2nd try)		* jnh: make contact with citigraphics (2nd try)
			** e-mail just sent...
	* sgf: color management conf call results to help decide whether to pay for internal color management (projector choice)		* sgf: color management conf call results to help decide whether to pay for internal color management (projector choice)
	* sgf+jnh: lay out the arguments for the two cases of color management; need scalable cost estimate, as well (find out about controls for both conditions)		* sgf+jnh: lay out the arguments for the two cases of color management; need scalable cost estimate, as well (find out about controls for both conditions)
	* jnh: more info about projector, including step size for various motorized controls		* jnh: more info about projector, including step size for various motorized controls
			** min step size for button shift is ~1pixel
			** min zoom moves edge ~1.5 pixel
			** keystoning is digital and should not be used
			** acutance seems a little fuzzy on a whiteboard
			** barrel/pincushion distortion < 1 pixel
	* sgf: find out from Rod what controls and interface on the two projectors we're considering		* sgf: find out from Rod what controls and interface on the two projectors we're considering
	* asf: VRG3D build proposal for "make" installation on linux		* asf: VRG3D build proposal for "make" installation on linux
			** see e-mail
	* sgf: facilities input re room possibilities (and costs?)		* sgf: facilities input re room possibilities (and costs?)
	* sgf+jnh: decide what sw issues need to be resolved this fall (tracking? color? reliability/testing? cluster management?)		* sgf+jnh: decide what sw issues need to be resolved this fall (tracking? color? reliability/testing? cluster management?)