<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Jaime_Darce</id>
	<title>Jaime Darce - Revision history</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Jaime_Darce"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/index.php?title=Jaime_Darce&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-04-24T05:12:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Revision history for this page on the wiki</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.1</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/index.php?title=Jaime_Darce&amp;diff=5975&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>Caroline Ziemkiewicz: Created page with &quot;Intro  using data from elsewhere compares two sets of cells - focus on regulatory t-cells wild type vs. missing one gene (PRDM-1)  what&#039;s the difference between normal T-regs ...&quot;</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/index.php?title=Jaime_Darce&amp;diff=5975&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2012-05-30T17:40:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Created page with &amp;quot;Intro  using data from elsewhere compares two sets of cells - focus on regulatory t-cells wild type vs. missing one gene (PRDM-1)  what&amp;#039;s the difference between normal T-regs ...&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;New page&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;Intro&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
using data from elsewhere&lt;br /&gt;
compares two sets of cells&lt;br /&gt;
- focus on regulatory t-cells&lt;br /&gt;
wild type vs. missing one gene (PRDM-1)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
what&amp;#039;s the difference between normal T-regs and those that lack the gene?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
in field, it&amp;#039;s thought that reg cells behave differently based on particular transcription factors&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
because data is from another lab, it&amp;#039;s based on a different platform and needs to be translated somewhat&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysis 1&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- Trying to upload data to genepattern, runs into errors right away&lt;br /&gt;
attributed to the difference between the two platforms&lt;br /&gt;
- editing a config file by hand&lt;br /&gt;
- goes to IT guy for help&lt;br /&gt;
some dead air on the recordings&lt;br /&gt;
- returns with solution&lt;br /&gt;
- goes to GP website&lt;br /&gt;
- uploads data to multiplot, chooses to launch visualizer&lt;br /&gt;
- Picks some settings and generates a scatterplot&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
? trying to get the genes that are significantly expressed by a fold change vs. coefficient of variance&lt;br /&gt;
3 replicates in dataset&lt;br /&gt;
expression values with a lot of variance&lt;br /&gt;
looking for consistent and plausible patterns (not noise or unreproducable effects)&lt;br /&gt;
...thus, why variance is so important&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- highlighting a set of points by selecting some criteria&lt;br /&gt;
needs to go to a rather large dialog box to do so&lt;br /&gt;
when criteria are changed it doesn&amp;#039;t show up immediately; must hit a &amp;quot;Plot&amp;quot; button&lt;br /&gt;
jaime sometimes plots intermediate steps anyway&lt;br /&gt;
- uses two different colors (red and blue) to highlight different things&lt;br /&gt;
- looking for other files&lt;br /&gt;
gets frustrated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
? not very familiar with this data&lt;br /&gt;
highlighted genes are overexpressed in one condition vs. another&lt;br /&gt;
different naming conventions between the two datasets&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
gives up on this analysis and starts a different one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Analysis 2&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- uploading new file&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt; i like to turn the data upside down, sideways&lt;br /&gt;
looking for realness&lt;br /&gt;
if you try different plots, different views, and still see something, can be more reassured that these genes are differentially expressed. &lt;br /&gt;
do these genes fall within this signature or not?&lt;br /&gt;
in the end it&amp;#039;s always the same, right, you want to see the diff b/w one population and the other&lt;br /&gt;
regular cell vs. modified foxb3&lt;br /&gt;
already observed the phenotype. what&amp;#039;s the difference b/w cells that are normal vs. modified ones&lt;br /&gt;
two different mouse lines as well: NOD vs. pb6 (?)&lt;br /&gt;
- brings up a scatterplot with a correlation line&lt;br /&gt;
- highlighting red and blue groups&lt;br /&gt;
- changing plot to see if outliers are still outliers&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
? looking to see if outlier-ness is unique to regulatory cells.  it is for blue genes, but not for red ones. so blue are more interesting (i wrote &amp;quot;red are more&amp;quot; in my notes... but that makes no sense.  check video.)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
- looks at volcano plot, which focuses on p-values&lt;br /&gt;
- zooming in on the blue points?&lt;br /&gt;
- filtering signficantly over-expressed genes&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
getting a signature for blues&lt;br /&gt;
are they also in cells infected by this factor?&lt;br /&gt;
another set of data is included now; look at cells infected w/ mt vector vs. a vector containing foxb3.&lt;br /&gt;
taking earlier group and looking at it in another dataset.&lt;br /&gt;
the differentiation requires more than just one factor.&lt;br /&gt;
interactions of factors and association w/ mutation&lt;br /&gt;
now i can go back and see what&amp;#039;s missing w/o PRDM-1&lt;br /&gt;
(which was a factor in analysis 2)&lt;br /&gt;
different between populations - how to get to the mutant&lt;br /&gt;
you can do this sort of thing for hours!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
output? a signature&lt;br /&gt;
seeing genes uniquely expressed by T-regs that have foxb3&lt;br /&gt;
learning how reg cells function&lt;br /&gt;
followup with in-depth biochemical analysis&lt;br /&gt;
where can i go next?&lt;br /&gt;
association of foxb3 with transcription factors? what level is the effect at? &lt;br /&gt;
now do more specific experiments&lt;br /&gt;
then do this same analysis again&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Caroline Ziemkiewicz</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>