CS295J/Class Members' Pages/Gideon/Week 1 - Revision history

Gideon Goldin: /* Literature Keys */

2009-01-30T16:15:11Z

Literature Keys

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:15, 30 January 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	**Discussant		**Discussant
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]
	**Poster, ~~Evaluated~~		**Poster, Evaluator
			*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition Evans-2003-ITM]
			**Poster, Evaluator

	==Summaries==		==Summaries==

Gideon Goldin: /* Literature Keys */

2009-01-30T15:36:23Z

Literature Keys

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 30 January 2009
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Literature Keys==		==Literature Keys==
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition Clark-1998-TEM]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition Clark-1998-TEM]
	**Owner, Evaluator		**Poster, Owner, Evaluator
	**[[#Summaries \| Summary]]		**[[#Summaries \| Summary]]
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Perception Scholl-2000-PCA]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Perception Scholl-2000-PCA]
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]
	**Poster, Evaluated		**Poster, Evaluated


	==Summaries==		==Summaries==

Gideon Goldin at 14:57, 30 January 2009

2009-01-30T14:57:00Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:57, 30 January 2009
Line 52:		Line 52:

	People often subconsciously make use of computer resources, and knowing which ones and to what degree will help us predict how users will interact with a system.		People often subconsciously make use of computer resources, and knowing which ones and to what degree will help us predict how users will interact with a system.


	==Helpful Links==		==Helpful Links==
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]

Gideon Goldin at 14:56, 30 January 2009

2009-01-30T14:56:52Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 30 January 2009
Line 11:		Line 11:
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature#Cognition HermerVazquez-1999-SFC]
	**Poster, Evaluated		**Poster, Evaluated


	==Summaries==		==Summaries==

Gideon Goldin: /* Summaries */

2009-01-30T14:56:41Z

Summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:56, 30 January 2009
Line 23:		Line 23:
	*It's not unreasonable to assume an advanced player will take this one step further, achieving a perfect state of efficiency in play, only moving when absolutely necessary.		*It's not unreasonable to assume an advanced player will take this one step further, achieving a perfect state of efficiency in play, only moving when absolutely necessary.

	However, this is not the case! In fact, an advanced player's actions, in many ways, resemble those of a complete beginner. Namely, the expert WILL make moves which, though seemingly unnecessary), are taking advantage of the computers ability to do the same thing he/she would be doing, but better.		However, this is not the case! In fact, an advanced player's actions, in many ways, resemble those of a complete beginner. Namely, the expert WILL make moves which, though seemingly unnecessary, are taking advantage of the computers ability to do the same thing he/she would be doing, but better.

	Concretely...		Concretely...
Line 42:		Line 42:
	</table>		</table>

	~~Mental deliberation can be slow, and in this case, the brain's RPM for tetris pieces is much higher.~~ Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. If you believe Google makes us smarter (as opposed to dumber), you would agree. The additional notion that cognition is actually taking place in the active external reality might be difficult to believe at first. For example, consider the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.		Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. Consider the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.

	*1) We can write directions down on paper.		*1) We can write directions down on paper.
Line 48:		Line 48:
	*3) We can insert them into our neural implants which integrate with memory and spatial navigation systems.		*3) We can insert them into our neural implants which integrate with memory and spatial navigation systems.

	~~Are the three cases so different? Are we more willing to say the ink on paper is less cognitive than the implant?~~ This paper argues that ~~indeed~~ these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.		This paper argues that these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.

	~~Understanding this will allow us to think about what humans will do when faced with computers.~~ People often subconsciously make use of computer resources, and ~~know~~ which ones and to what degree will help us predict how users will interact with a system.		People often subconsciously make use of computer resources, and knowing which ones and to what degree will help us predict how users will interact with a system.

	==Helpful Links==		==Helpful Links==
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]

Gideon Goldin: /* Summaries */

2009-01-30T14:53:28Z

Summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:53, 30 January 2009
Line 49:		Line 49:

	Are the three cases so different? Are we more willing to say the ink on paper is less cognitive than the implant? This paper argues that indeed these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.		Are the three cases so different? Are we more willing to say the ink on paper is less cognitive than the implant? This paper argues that indeed these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.

			Understanding this will allow us to think about what humans will do when faced with computers. People often subconsciously make use of computer resources, and know which ones and to what degree will help us predict how users will interact with a system.

	==Helpful Links==		==Helpful Links==
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]

Gideon Goldin: /* Summaries */

2009-01-30T14:50:17Z

Summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:50, 30 January 2009
Line 42:		Line 42:
	</table>		</table>

	Mental deliberation can be slow, and in this case, the brain's RPM for tetris pieces is much higher. Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. If you believe Google makes us smarter (as opposed to dumber), you would agree. The additional notion that cognition is actually taking place in the active external reality might be difficult to believe at first. For example, ~~Consider~~ the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.		Mental deliberation can be slow, and in this case, the brain's RPM for tetris pieces is much higher. Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. If you believe Google makes us smarter (as opposed to dumber), you would agree. The additional notion that cognition is actually taking place in the active external reality might be difficult to believe at first. For example, consider the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.

	*1) We can write directions down on paper.		*1) We can write directions down on paper.

Gideon Goldin: /* Summaries */

2009-01-30T14:49:40Z

Summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 30 January 2009
Line 29:		Line 29:
	<table cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" border="1">		<table cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" border="1">
	<tr>		<tr>
	<td>'Action'</td><td>'time [ms]'</td>		<td><b>Action</b></td><td><b>time [ms]</b></td>
	</tr>		</tr>
	<tr>		<tr>

Gideon Goldin: /* Summaries */

2009-01-30T14:49:19Z

Summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:49, 30 January 2009
Line 27:		Line 27:
	Concretely...		Concretely...

	<table cellpadding="20" cellspacing="0" border="1">		<table cellpadding="10" cellspacing="0" border="1">
	<tr>		<tr>
	<td>Action</td><td>time [ms]</td>		<td>'Action'</td><td>'time [ms]'</td>
	</tr>		</tr>
	<tr>		<tr>

Gideon Goldin: /* Summaries */

2009-01-30T14:48:58Z

Summaries

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 30 January 2009
Line 41:		Line 41:
	</tr>		</tr>
	</table>		</table>

			Mental deliberation can be slow, and in this case, the brain's RPM for tetris pieces is much higher. Using our environment for cognitive tasks is something we do all the time. If you believe Google makes us smarter (as opposed to dumber), you would agree. The additional notion that cognition is actually taking place in the active external reality might be difficult to believe at first. For example, Consider the problem of following directions to get to a new restaurant.

			*1) We can write directions down on paper.
			*2) We can map them on our iPhones.
			*3) We can insert them into our neural implants which integrate with memory and spatial navigation systems.

			Are the three cases so different? Are we more willing to say the ink on paper is less cognitive than the implant? This paper argues that indeed these cases are fundamentally equivalent in terms of distribution of cognition.

	==Helpful Links==		==Helpful Links==
	*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]		*[http://vrl.cs.brown.edu/wiki/CS295J/Literature Literature Page]