CS295J/Class 12 - Revision history

Ian Spector at 19:06, 17 April 2009

2009-04-17T19:06:24Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:06, 17 April 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	** Andrew		** Andrew
	** other "owned" tasks from assignments page		** other "owned" tasks from assignments page
	* iPhone Human Interface Guidelines: http://developer.apple.com/iPhone/library/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/MobileHIG.pdf		* iPhone Human Interface Guidelines: [http://developer.apple.com/iPhone/library/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/Introduction/Introduction.html Web Version], [http://developer.apple.com/iPhone/library/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/MobileHIG.pdf PDF Version]

Ian Spector at 18:57, 17 April 2009

2009-04-17T18:57:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:57, 17 April 2009
Line 10:		Line 10:
	** Andrew		** Andrew
	** other "owned" tasks from assignments page		** other "owned" tasks from assignments page
			* iPhone Human Interface Guidelines: http://developer.apple.com/iPhone/library/documentation/UserExperience/Conceptual/MobileHIG/MobileHIG.pdf

Eric Sodomka at 16:29, 17 April 2009

2009-04-17T16:29:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:29, 17 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	** multitasking theory -- builds on 3-14 min paper, cognitive (.1-10 sec) vs. rational (1-100 min), are scale unifiable?, ACT-R symbolic or O'Reilly connectionist basis for our models?, how is this different from CPM-GOMS?, could neuropsych testing inform timings for particular actions in a model?, leaving a window visible decreases time recovering from an interruption, is this approach likely to be better for understanding interfaces or humans?		** multitasking theory -- builds on 3-14 min paper, cognitive (.1-10 sec) vs. rational (1-100 min), are scale unifiable?, ACT-R symbolic or O'Reilly connectionist basis for our models?, how is this different from CPM-GOMS?, could neuropsych testing inform timings for particular actions in a model?, leaving a window visible decreases time recovering from an interruption, is this approach likely to be better for understanding interfaces or humans?
	** Automating CPM-GOMS -- Apex and PDL languages, PERT charts, we're up to 2002!, any followon work?, can we get this and try it?, model human processor showing up again, CPM-GOMS accurate for ~100th trial		** Automating CPM-GOMS -- Apex and PDL languages, PERT charts, we're up to 2002!, any followon work?, can we get this and try it?, model human processor showing up again, CPM-GOMS accurate for ~100th trial
			*** [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/projects/apex/ Apex home page]
			*** [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/projects/apex/projectHCI.php Apex: Project HCI]
			*** [http://ti.arc.nasa.gov/projects/apex/software.php Download Apex]
	** EEG/HCI -- spatial resolution?, temporal res (4 sec?), can we distinguish CPM from one another?		** EEG/HCI -- spatial resolution?, temporal res (4 sec?), can we distinguish CPM from one another?
	* can we merge design-based work with model-oriented work to get the best of both worlds?		* can we merge design-based work with model-oriented work to get the best of both worlds?

David Laidlaw at 20:49, 16 April 2009

2009-04-16T20:49:41Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:49, 16 April 2009
Line 2:		Line 2:
	** multitasking theory -- builds on 3-14 min paper, cognitive (.1-10 sec) vs. rational (1-100 min), are scale unifiable?, ACT-R symbolic or O'Reilly connectionist basis for our models?, how is this different from CPM-GOMS?, could neuropsych testing inform timings for particular actions in a model?, leaving a window visible decreases time recovering from an interruption, is this approach likely to be better for understanding interfaces or humans?		** multitasking theory -- builds on 3-14 min paper, cognitive (.1-10 sec) vs. rational (1-100 min), are scale unifiable?, ACT-R symbolic or O'Reilly connectionist basis for our models?, how is this different from CPM-GOMS?, could neuropsych testing inform timings for particular actions in a model?, leaving a window visible decreases time recovering from an interruption, is this approach likely to be better for understanding interfaces or humans?
	** Automating CPM-GOMS -- Apex and PDL languages, PERT charts, we're up to 2002!, any followon work?, can we get this and try it?, model human processor showing up again, CPM-GOMS accurate for ~100th trial		** Automating CPM-GOMS -- Apex and PDL languages, PERT charts, we're up to 2002!, any followon work?, can we get this and try it?, model human processor showing up again, CPM-GOMS accurate for ~100th trial
			** EEG/HCI -- spatial resolution?, temporal res (4 sec?), can we distinguish CPM from one another?
	* can we merge design-based work with model-oriented work to get the best of both worlds?		* can we merge design-based work with model-oriented work to get the best of both worlds?
	* prelim results		* prelim results
	** Andrew		** Andrew
	** other "owned" tasks from assignments page		** other "owned" tasks from assignments page

David Laidlaw at 20:45, 16 April 2009

2009-04-16T20:45:16Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:45, 16 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* papers		* papers
	** multitasking theory; builds on 3-14 min paper, cognitive (.1-10 sec) vs. rational (1-100 min), are scale unifiable?, ACT-R symbolic or O'Reilly connectionist basis for our models?, how is this different from CPM-GOMS?, could neuropsych testing inform timings for particular actions in a model?, leaving a window visible decreases time recovering from an interruption, is this approach likely to be better for understanding interfaces or humans?		** multitasking theory -- builds on 3-14 min paper, cognitive (.1-10 sec) vs. rational (1-100 min), are scale unifiable?, ACT-R symbolic or O'Reilly connectionist basis for our models?, how is this different from CPM-GOMS?, could neuropsych testing inform timings for particular actions in a model?, leaving a window visible decreases time recovering from an interruption, is this approach likely to be better for understanding interfaces or humans?
			** Automating CPM-GOMS -- Apex and PDL languages, PERT charts, we're up to 2002!, any followon work?, can we get this and try it?, model human processor showing up again, CPM-GOMS accurate for ~100th trial
			* can we merge design-based work with model-oriented work to get the best of both worlds?
	* prelim results		* prelim results
	** Andrew		** Andrew
			** other "owned" tasks from assignments page

David Laidlaw at 19:44, 16 April 2009

2009-04-16T19:44:20Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:44, 16 April 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	* papers		* papers
	** multitasking theory		** multitasking theory; builds on 3-14 min paper, cognitive (.1-10 sec) vs. rational (1-100 min), are scale unifiable?, ACT-R symbolic or O'Reilly connectionist basis for our models?, how is this different from CPM-GOMS?, could neuropsych testing inform timings for particular actions in a model?, leaving a window visible decreases time recovering from an interruption, is this approach likely to be better for understanding interfaces or humans?
	* prelim results		* prelim results
	** Andrew		** Andrew

David Laidlaw: New page: * papers ** multitasking theory * prelim results ** Andrew

2009-04-16T19:18:32Z

New page: * papers ** multitasking theory * prelim results ** Andrew

New page

* papers
** multitasking theory
* prelim results
** Andrew